BHP iron ore growth faces keen competition in Australia

  • Saturday, September 18, 2021

  • Keywords:BHP, iron ore, Australia
[Fellow]The Western Australian (WA) government has granted mining firm BHP approval to export up to 330mn t/yr of iron ore through Port Hedland.
[Ferro-Alloys.comThe Western Australian (WA) government has granted mining firm BHP approval to export up to 330mn t/yr of iron ore through Port Hedland, but the battle is on with other port users to secure enough channel capacity to match expansion plans.
The WA government approval increases BHP's export potential from its previous licence of 290mn t/yr and gives it more flexibility to meet its medium-term target of 310mn t/yr, but it is only useful to the firm if it is matched by a similar channel allocation by the Pilbara Ports Authority (PPA), which operates Port Hedland.
The PPA is balancing ambitious growth plans from its five major iron ore exporters, as well as from those exporting manganese, salt, and lithium and copper concentrates. The WA state government expanded the maximum capacity of Port Hedland by 7pc to 617mn t/yr in October 2019, but the combined plans of iron ore exporters BHP, Fortescue, Roy Hill, Atlas Iron, and Mineral Resources (MinRes) demand around 670mn t/yr capacity (see table below).
This has led to lobbying by all users to demand fair allocation of channel capacity, which is a major bottleneck for the port. An outer harbour at Port Hedland, which would remove pressure on the channel, has been suggested several times over the past 20 years, but it would cost around $10bn and may be rendered unnecessary if a medium- to long-term decline in demand for WA iron ore eventuates.
BHP, Fortescue and Roy Hill dominate Port Hedland at present, but WA independent MinRes, which has the most ambitious growth plans, demands that the state government and the PPA do not show preference to the incumbents. Fortescue has been granted WA government approval to expand output through Port Hedland to 210mn t/yr but has not been granted channel allocation for the additional throughput despite spending $3.3bn-3.5bn on the 22mn t/yr Iron Bridge project, which is due to start production by the end of next year.
Roy Hill and Atlas are both majority-owned by Hancock Prospecting, which is run by ambitious iron ore magnate Gina Rinehart. Both have more modest medium-growth plans, but it is unlikely that Rinehart will let her rivals tie up the remaining channel capacity at Port Hedland.
Rinehart, Fortescue chairman Andrew Forrest and MinRes managing director Chris Ellison are all significant public figures in WA with strong political clout, while BHP has been a cornerstone of the WA economy of decades. Allocation of the Port Hedland channel capacity is difficult politically and economically for the state government, which ultimately owns the PPA. It may be easier to increase the capacity of the channel again than to decide between the five major iron ore exporters, although at some point, the channel will reach its physical maximum limit and decisions will have to be made.
Source: argusmedia
  • [Editor:kangmingfei]

Tell Us What You Think

please login!   login   register
Please be logged in to comment!