The Cobalt Cliff Will Crush Tesla's Business And May Restore Some Sanity To The EV Industry

  • Tuesday, October 10, 2017
  • Source:ferro-alloys.com

  • Keywords:lithium manganese oxide, or LMO, and lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, batteries
[Fellow][ferro-alloys.com] Globally, politicians, demagogues and advocates of all stripes are flogging initiatives to ban internal combustion engines, or ICE, from their petroleum blighted homelands.

Summary

Globally, politicians, demagogues and advocates of all stripes are flogging initiatives to ban internal combustion engines, or ICE, from their petroleum blighted homelands.

Victory celebrations for proposed ICE bans have been reported in Germany, France, China, the United Kingdom and most recently the Peoples Republic of California.

Manufacturing 34.5 million electric vehicles, or EVs, to replace the conventional vehicles sold in those jurisdictions every year would require about 276,000 TPY of cobalt.

Manufacturing 100 million EVs per year to completely replace ICE technology would require about 800,000 TPY of refined cobalt and exhaust planetary reserves in less than seven years.

Since optimistic cobalt growth forecasts only show 41,200 TPY available for EV batteries by 2025, the politicians, demagogues and advocates will be bitterly disappointed.

A brief history of the EV industry

The birth of the EV industry is usually pegged to the summer of 2008 when crude oil prices peaked above $140 per barrel. Tesla (TSLA) was a few months from launching its electric Roadster and I started blogging on battery investing for Seeking Alpha.

At the time, the DOE and everybody in the auto industry pegged their EV hopes and dreams on lithium manganese oxide, or LMO, and lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, batteries. The reasons were simple. Both chemistries had great performance profiles for EVs and both chemistries were made using cheap and abundant raw materials – lithium, manganese and iron.

The sole renegade was Tesla, which planned to use consumer grade cells and a nickel-cobalt chemistry instead of more costly automotive grade LMO and LFP cells. Tesla's theory, which had more than a touch of genius, was that using consumer grade cells would allow it to over-build its battery packs to improve safety and slow cell degradation while pitching a 300-mile range with neck snapping acceleration as major advantages, even though most Tesla owners would crawl through city traffic with the rest of us and average less than 35 miles of daily driving.

 

  • [Editor:Wang Linyan]

Tell Us What You Think

please login!   login   register
Please be logged in to comment!